- we chose the cook because we thought it was ironic because he went to riches to rage
Describe main character
He would gamble, kept doing it and he was fired because he was influencing other people.
-he was stealing the money, very reckless.
-wife was a prostitute, front was a store owner
- was leach in that he was living off of his master and now he is living off of his
3. Chaucer frowned down upon his choices, that the character made,
- more serious. Wasn't sympathy was more blunt.
- cook was kind of crap, uses other people for gambling problem
- syntax show cook in bad light
4. Man verses himself in that Perkins verses his morals in that
5. The story telling genre is moral tale what is right and wrong because he was a bad soul.
6. It talks about all the different social statuses, the irony the cook is supposed to be an apprentice and a respectful man, but he is out gambling and has a prostitute as a man.
7. You could make the story better by finishing the story where the cook falls into a deeper hole. Further humiliating the character
8. if you apply the same situation to a kings son or higher status the characters problems would be set aside, overlooked. Just like celebrities today.
9.the authors irony makes the message that the cook doesn't care in that he lacks morals, physically couldn't gain morals because he was licentious.
- the message is irony in that is that they are supposed to be going on
- shows the sides of human nature.
10. The techniques would be how effective irony is in which I can use it. How to depict life in it's morals. We can read in between the lines make the reader infer more about what you are writing. Can improve by using connotations of words to give messages that are more concise.
Outline
- direct by saying he is a gambler
- indirect talks about the actions how he never changes
-How to depict life in it's morals. We can read in between the lines make the reader infer more about what you are writing.
-Can improve by using connotations of words to give messages that are more concise.
-if you apply the same situation to a kings son or higher status the characters problems would be set aside, overlooked. Just like celebrities today.
-Chaucer frowned down upon his choices, that the character made,
- more serious. Wasn't sympathy was more blunt.
- cook was kind of crap, uses other people for gambling problem
- syntax show cook in bad light
-ironic because he went to riches to rage
No comments:
Post a Comment